Ghanaian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,221,918 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $119,756, a difference of 32.9%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $54,264, a difference of 28.7%), and median male earnings ($52,810 compared to $67,353, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $69,174, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $46,972, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 45.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 55.0%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 38.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 58.3%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%).