Chinese vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,766,641 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.403% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 402.6 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,226, a difference of 33.0%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $92,545, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $93,176, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,599, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,673, a difference of 13.1%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 85.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 69.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 48.0%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.49, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 163.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.4%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.6%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.61%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%).