Chinese vs Palestinian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,308,721 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Palestinians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 51.1 Palestinians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,800, a difference of 21.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,515, a difference of 12.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $90,574, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,484, a difference of 0.050%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,790, a difference of 0.67%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,209, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 58.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.9%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.87%).