Chinese vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,273,890 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.388% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 387.6 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,133, a difference of 43.1%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $72,682, a difference of 35.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $86,125, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.8%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $48,669, a difference of 16.9%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,252, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 66.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 66.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 66.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.9%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.3%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.5%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 50.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 12.9%).