Japanese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,073,870 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 46.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $54,264, a difference of 36.1%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $67,353, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $119,756, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $69,174, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 47.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.89%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.1%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.3%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 60.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 103.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.6%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 42.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.6%).