Central American Indian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,647,293 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 54.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $119,756, a difference of 45.4%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $54,264, a difference of 43.9%), and median family income ($88,034 compared to $125,540, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 17.7%), householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $57,931, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $69,174, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 78.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 57.9%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 49.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 102.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 85.3%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 66.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.7%).