Chinese vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,398,916 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 15.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $67,333, a difference of 15.0%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,575, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,294, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $105,085, a difference of 0.79%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $115,230, a difference of 0.83%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,446, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 34.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 32.5%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.98%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%), family households (68.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.4%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.1%).