Chinese vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,278,575 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,162, a difference of 24.6%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $62,658, a difference of 10.2%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,303, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.72%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $114,586, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $107,393, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 51.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 17.9%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 103.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 86.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 53.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.6%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.2%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.060%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).