Maltese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,473,500 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.367% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to a decrease of 367.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,640 compared to $54,264, a difference of 9.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $119,756, a difference of 8.8%), and median household income ($97,015 compared to $105,335, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,027 compared to $69,174, a difference of 4.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $122,178, a difference of 6.5%), and median male earnings ($62,953 compared to $67,353, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.74%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.9%), births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple households (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 66.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.1%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 39.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.5%).