Chinese vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from India
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Immigrants from India

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,255
SOCIAL INDEX
100/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
1st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from India Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,476,390 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.060% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 59.6 Immigrants from India.
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from India Communities

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $74,207, a difference of 30.5%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $60,648, a difference of 24.2%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $59,914, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $72,804, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $132,488, a difference of 14.1%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Income
Income MetricChineseImmigrants from India
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Exceptional
$55,268
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Exceptional
$134,028
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Exceptional
$113,009
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Exceptional
$60,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Exceptional
$74,207
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Exceptional
$48,292
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Exceptional
$59,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Exceptional
$124,238
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Exceptional
$132,488
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Exceptional
$72,804
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Tragic
31.5%

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseImmigrants from India
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Exceptional
23.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseImmigrants from India
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseImmigrants from India
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
67.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Exceptional
84.7%

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.1%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseImmigrants from India
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
31.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Exceptional
52.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Poor
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Exceptional
51.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Exceptional
22.9%

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseImmigrants from India
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Average
6.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.3%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 53.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (94.6% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseImmigrants from India
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Exceptional
89.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
74.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Exceptional
69.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
58.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Exceptional
51.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
22.3%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.8%

Chinese vs Immigrants from India Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.5%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.0%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.8%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Disability
Disability MetricChineseImmigrants from India
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%