Chinese vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,283,683 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.228% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 228.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,950, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $86,573, a difference of 34.2%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $87,191, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,447, a difference of 13.1%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,444, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 97.2%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 83.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.8%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 46.4%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.1%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 142.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.6%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.80%).