Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from China
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,136,458 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.573% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 573.4 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $119,756, a difference of 12.0%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $105,335, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $122,178, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $69,174, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($51,770 compared to $54,264, a difference of 4.8%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Exceptional $54,264 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Exceptional $125,540 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $105,335 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Exceptional $56,638 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Exceptional $67,353 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Exceptional $46,972 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $57,931 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Exceptional $119,756 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Exceptional $122,178 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Exceptional $69,174 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.83%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.7% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Average 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Good 17.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Excellent 65.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Tragic 31.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 71.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.5%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Average 27.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Fair 92.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Good 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Exceptional 70.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Exceptional 55.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 21.2% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 24.2%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from China |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.3% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |