Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bermudan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bermudans

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Bermudan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,498,772 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 304.2 Immigrants from China.
Bermudan Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $119,756, a difference of 35.7%), median household income ($80,406 compared to $105,335, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $122,178, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 15.4%), householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $69,174, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $46,972, a difference of 19.2%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,911
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,577
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,406
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,593
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,465
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,418
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,359
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,231
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,197
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,171
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.1%
Poor
26.7%

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 41.2%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.9%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.67%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Exceptional
83.2%

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 44.0%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.96%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
24.7%

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
6.0%

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.8%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.3%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.2%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.4%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
3.1%

Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 42.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.8%).
Bermudan vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricBermudanImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%