Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Jordan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Jordan
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,031
SOCIAL INDEX
87.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
33rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Jordan Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,292,383 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 51.5 Immigrants from Jordan.
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,041, a difference of 22.9%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,370, a difference of 13.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $89,412, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,673, a difference of 0.34%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,145, a difference of 0.48%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,977, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Excellent $45,066 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $107,715 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $89,412 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,673 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $57,145 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $40,977 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Poor $51,370 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $97,185 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $106,164 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Excellent $63,041 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Fair 26.3% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.0%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Good 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Average 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.3% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.81%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Good 19.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Good 6.5% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Excellent 89.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 86.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 61.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Jordan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.8%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Jordan |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |