Soviet Union vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,281,389 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.635% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 1,634.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,098 compared to $105,335, a difference of 10.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,457 compared to $119,756, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($54,202 compared to $54,264, a difference of 0.11%), median female earnings ($46,556 compared to $46,972, a difference of 0.89%), and median earnings ($54,290 compared to $56,638, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.66%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.0%), family households with children (24.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.060%), college, under 1 year (71.1% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.4%).