Chinese vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,974,547 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 28.3 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,638, a difference of 25.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $102,779, a difference of 13.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,262, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $44,090, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,622, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.8%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.6%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.5%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.2%).