Chinese vs Italian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,787,805 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Italians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Italians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 62.1 Italians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,885, a difference of 21.3%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,426, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $104,215, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,505, a difference of 0.10%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,915, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and male poverty (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 69.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.4%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.12, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.4%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%).