Jamaican vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 327,119,007 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to a decrease of 27.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,933 compared to $119,756, a difference of 42.7%), median family income ($90,581 compared to $125,540, a difference of 38.6%), and median male earnings ($48,632 compared to $67,353, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $46,972, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,560 compared to $69,174, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 71.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 49.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 62.9%), births to unmarried women (38.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 55.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 112.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 80.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.5%).