Comanche vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Immigrants from China
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,293,236 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.185% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 184.7 Immigrants from China.
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $119,756, a difference of 45.8%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $105,335, a difference of 42.8%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $54,264, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $57,931, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $69,174, a difference of 26.0%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Poor 26.7% |
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 54.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.1%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 47.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 96.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 90.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Comanche vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.3%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |