Cuban vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cuban
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cubans

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Cuban Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,347,927 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.456. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 Immigrants from China.
Cuban Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $125,540, a difference of 47.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $119,756, a difference of 47.0%), and per capita income ($37,383 compared to $54,264, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $57,931, a difference of 14.4%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $46,972, a difference of 34.4%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricCubanImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,383
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,981
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,392
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,619
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,580
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,942
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,655
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,483
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,301
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,152
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Poor
26.7%

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 90.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.4%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.5%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricCubanImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.2%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
9.6%

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCubanImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCubanImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.5%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.2%

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 59.6%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 44.5%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCubanImmigrants from China
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 78.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCubanImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.3%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
6.0%

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 124.2%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 75.4%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricCubanImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.6%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.9%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
3.1%

Cuban vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 29.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricCubanImmigrants from China
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%