Chinese vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,198,683 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 37.9 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,397, a difference of 50.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $83,015, a difference of 39.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $70,605, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $52,325, a difference of 8.7%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,189, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,034, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 89.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 87.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 40.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.5%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 49.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 111.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.2%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 35.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.1%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.17, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 4.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.7%).