Houma vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,074,442 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 80.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $122,178, a difference of 69.5%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $105,335, a difference of 68.3%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $125,540, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $57,931, a difference of 30.6%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $67,353, a difference of 33.3%), and wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 44.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 106.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 102.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 77.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 62.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 88.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 222.2%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 203.6%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 167.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 114.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 100.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.9%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.2%).