Chinese vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,591,354 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.145% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 145.0 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,719, a difference of 41.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $86,402, a difference of 34.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $74,112, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,960, a difference of 15.3%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,263, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 68.8%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 67.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 62.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 57.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.83%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 140.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%).