Immigrants from Dominica vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,147,148 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Dominica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.350% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominica corresponds to an increase of 349.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,351 compared to $119,756, a difference of 47.2%), median family income ($85,411 compared to $125,540, a difference of 47.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,311 compared to $122,178, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,301 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.2%), median female earnings ($37,825 compared to $46,972, a difference of 24.2%), and wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 92.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 66.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.7%), single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father poverty (18.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 72.6%), births to unmarried women (39.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 60.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (41.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 123.2%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%), 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.7%).