Chinese vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,594,400 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 113.2 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,265, a difference of 45.4%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $86,989, a difference of 33.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $87,219, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,387, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,307, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 97.5%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 81.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.2%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.6%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 53.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.42, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 123.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.4%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.91%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.7%).