Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from China
8,900
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
40th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Australia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,079,718 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.150% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to a decrease of 150.3 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $54,264, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $119,756, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $69,174, a difference of 0.010%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $67,353, a difference of 0.42%), and median earnings ($56,305 compared to $56,638, a difference of 0.59%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $57,953 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $126,620 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $102,562 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,305 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,634 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,573 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,660 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $115,947 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $119,308 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,164 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.7% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.1% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.2%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 61.3% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.6% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.78%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.4% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.4% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and college, under 1 year (72.7% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.18%), associate's degree (55.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.7% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.8% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |