Pima vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,387,581 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.165% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 164.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $54,264, a difference of 77.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $122,178, a difference of 66.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $105,335, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.5%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $46,972, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.3%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 130.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 125.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.8%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 47.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 145.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 137.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 126.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 108.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.23, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 134.1%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 129.0%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 108.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.35%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 90.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 85.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.4%).