Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from England
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from England

Immigrants from China

Good
Good
8,183
SOCIAL INDEX
79.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
83rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from England Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 359,074,725 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 124.8 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from England Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $119,756, a difference of 17.4%), median household income ($92,098 compared to $105,335, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($49,722 compared to $56,638, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $69,174, a difference of 5.3%), and per capita income ($48,844 compared to $54,264, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,844
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,038
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,098
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,722
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,527
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,277
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,817
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,020
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,446
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,715
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Poor
26.7%

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 25.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.1%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 74.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.9%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.1%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.7%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
3.1%

Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 42.1%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.78%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EnglandImmigrants from China
Disability
Poor
12.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%