Chinese vs Yaqui Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,628,880 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yaqui within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.941. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.398% in Yaqui. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 398.1 Yaqui.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,417, a difference of 37.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $86,914, a difference of 33.6%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $87,289, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,943, a difference of 18.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,647, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 74.4%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 74.3%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.4%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.8%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 44.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.47%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 65.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.4%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%).