Belgian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,844,093 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to a decrease of 26.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,262 compared to $119,756, a difference of 27.1%), median household income ($84,008 compared to $105,335, a difference of 25.4%), and per capita income ($43,951 compared to $54,264, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($59,915 compared to $69,174, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 39.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.82%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 89.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.8%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.91%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%).