Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,027,362 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 129.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.8%), per capita income ($57,384 compared to $54,264, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $57,931, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($46,902 compared to $46,972, a difference of 0.15%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,893 compared to $122,178, a difference of 0.59%), and median earnings ($57,034 compared to $56,638, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 9.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.59%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.43%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.40%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.52%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.3%), professional degree (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), disability (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.31%).