Chinese vs Bolivian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,695,326 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.088% in Bolivians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 87.8 Bolivians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,526, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $61,066, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $52,005, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $58,506, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $118,871, a difference of 2.3%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $119,479, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.0%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.6%).