Chinese vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,148,966 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.097% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 97.1 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $55,327, a difference of 40.0%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 34.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $91,357, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,958, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,820, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,631, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 75.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 70.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.7%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.4%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 23.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 188.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 108.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.1%).