Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

Immigrants from China

Poor
Good
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,105,825 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from China.
Lumbee Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $119,756, a difference of 98.6%), median household income ($54,644 compared to $105,335, a difference of 92.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $122,178, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 25.1%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $46,972, a difference of 44.5%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $56,638, a difference of 53.6%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Poor
26.7%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 144.8%), receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 139.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 134.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 49.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 57.9%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.6%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 121.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 73.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.5%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 95.3%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 79.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
24.7%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.1%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.0%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 183.4%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 173.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Exceptional
3.1%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 102.8%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.6%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 79.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%