Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,030,306 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Italy communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Italy within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.771% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Italy corresponds to an increase of 770.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,201 compared to $119,756, a difference of 13.8%), median male earnings ($59,691 compared to $67,353, a difference of 12.8%), and median household income ($93,465 compared to $105,335, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.79%), householder income under 25 years ($54,449 compared to $57,931, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,065 compared to $69,174, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.0%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.70%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.9%).