Hmong vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from China

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,479,462 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.578% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 1,578.2 Immigrants from China.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $54,264, a difference of 42.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $119,756, a difference of 42.1%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $67,353, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $57,931, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $69,174, a difference of 22.8%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Poor
26.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from China
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.61%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from China
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
24.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Poor
6.0%

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 96.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 79.6%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
3.1%

Hmong vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%