Fijian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Fijian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Fijians

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Fijian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,884,210 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.116% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 116.4 Immigrants from China.
Fijian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $119,756, a difference of 49.8%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $54,264, a difference of 47.9%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $67,353, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $69,174, a difference of 21.8%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricFijianImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,690
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,387
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,205
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,193
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,607
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,114
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,132
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,956
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,187
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,768
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Poor
26.7%

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricFijianImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFijianImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.8%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFijianImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.2%
Exceptional
83.2%

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFijianImmigrants from China
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.1%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFijianImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
6.0%

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 173.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 129.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 105.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricFijianImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.0%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.4%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Exceptional
3.1%

Fijian vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 52.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%).
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricFijianImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%