Chinese vs Sioux Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Sioux
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Sioux
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sioux Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,344,727 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.846% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 845.8 Sioux.
Chinese vs Sioux Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $52,509, a difference of 47.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $67,792, a difference of 45.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $81,750, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,063, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $39,448, a difference of 23.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $33,921 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $82,386 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $67,792 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $39,448 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $45,566 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $35,063 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $46,417 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $77,089 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $81,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $52,509 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 24.3% |
Chinese vs Sioux Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 143.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 138.5%), and male poverty (8.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 115.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 55.0%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 57.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 72.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 28.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 26.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 25.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 25.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 31.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 23.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 38.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Chinese vs Sioux Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 95.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 91.7%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 19.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Chinese vs Sioux Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 41.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 78.0% |
Chinese vs Sioux Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.52, a difference of 5.2%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 41.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.52 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 41.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 41.0% |
Chinese vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 56.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Chinese vs Sioux Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 59.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 53.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 29.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chinese vs Sioux Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Sioux |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 49.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |