Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,125,281 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 157.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $119,756, a difference of 6.7%), median household income ($100,711 compared to $105,335, a difference of 4.6%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $69,174, a difference of 0.87%), per capita income ($53,359 compared to $54,264, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($122,764 compared to $125,540, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.71%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.7%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.6%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.74%).