Chinese vs Moroccan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Moroccan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Moroccans
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Moroccan Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,171,995 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 20.1 Moroccans.
Chinese vs Moroccan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,683, a difference of 29.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $100,138, a difference of 16.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,468, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,838, a difference of 0.010%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,854, a difference of 0.53%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,499, a difference of 0.66%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $45,854 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Good $104,488 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Good $86,468 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,838 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Excellent $56,499 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $41,872 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $53,256 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Good $96,117 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Average $100,138 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Fair $59,683 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Chinese vs Moroccan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 55.5%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Fair 13.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 12.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Chinese vs Moroccan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chinese vs Moroccan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Poor 35.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Poor 82.5% |
Chinese vs Moroccan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.5%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 61.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Average 31.8% |
Chinese vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 80.1%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 85.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 48.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Chinese vs Moroccan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.7%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.70%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Excellent 48.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese vs Moroccan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Moroccan |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |