Chinese vs Moroccan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Moroccans

Exceptional
Fair
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Moroccan Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,171,995 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 20.1 Moroccans.
Chinese Integration in Moroccan Communities

Chinese vs Moroccan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,683, a difference of 29.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $100,138, a difference of 16.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,468, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,838, a difference of 0.010%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,854, a difference of 0.53%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,499, a difference of 0.66%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Income
Income MetricChineseMoroccan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Exceptional
$45,854
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Good
$104,488
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Good
$86,468
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Exceptional
$48,838
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Excellent
$56,499
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Exceptional
$41,872
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Exceptional
$53,256
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Good
$96,117
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Average
$100,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Fair
$59,683
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Exceptional
24.0%

Chinese vs Moroccan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 55.5%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.8%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseMoroccan
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
18.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.8%

Chinese vs Moroccan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.2%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseMoroccan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Chinese vs Moroccan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseMoroccan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Poor
35.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Poor
82.5%

Chinese vs Moroccan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.5%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseMoroccan
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Average
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Average
31.8%

Chinese vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 80.1%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.3%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseMoroccan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
14.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
48.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
15.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
4.9%

Chinese vs Moroccan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.7%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.70%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseMoroccan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Exceptional
40.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%

Chinese vs Moroccan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Chinese vs Moroccan Disability
Disability MetricChineseMoroccan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%