Mongolian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,701,046 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.922% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 922.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $119,756, a difference of 14.5%), median household income ($93,971 compared to $105,335, a difference of 12.1%), and median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $67,353, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.19%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $69,174, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $122,178, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.93%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%).