Chinese vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,568,788 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.307% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 1,306.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $44,822, a difference of 72.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $72,093, a difference of 61.1%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $62,575, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $50,547, a difference of 12.5%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $38,949, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $44,356, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 124.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 120.9%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 113.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 62.1%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 68.4%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 73.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 82.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.3%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 53.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 53.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 80.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 39.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 101.3%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 84.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 92.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 81.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.2%).