Chinese vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,007,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 69.0 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($116,188 compared to $72,193, a difference of 60.9%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $61,663, a difference of 59.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $49,121, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.0%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $33,205, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $45,248, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 213.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 207.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 166.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 42.9%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 74.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 91.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 111.5%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 106.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 93.8%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 76.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.53, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 90.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 57.5%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 66.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 16.4%).