Chinese vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,272,399 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 152.4 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $68,235, a difference of 13.5%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $41,693, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $105,967, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $56,972, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $99,604, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $93,076, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.7%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.1%).