Chinese vs Shoshone Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Shoshone

Exceptional
Fair
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Shoshone Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,887,963 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 32.528% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 32,527.7 Shoshone.
Chinese Integration in Shoshone Communities

Chinese vs Shoshone Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,681, a difference of 44.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $83,588, a difference of 39.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $72,660, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.9%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $47,930, a difference of 18.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,932, a difference of 19.3%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Income
Income MetricChineseShoshone
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Tragic
$37,072
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Tragic
$87,872
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Tragic
$72,660
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Tragic
$40,932
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Tragic
$47,930
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Tragic
$34,677
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Tragic
$48,720
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Tragic
$82,062
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Tragic
$83,588
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Tragic
$53,681
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Good
25.4%

Chinese vs Shoshone Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 67.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 67.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 26.6%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 39.3%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseShoshone
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
25.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Poor
12.4%

Chinese vs Shoshone Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 93.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 67.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 28.3%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseShoshone
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%

Chinese vs Shoshone Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseShoshone
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Exceptional
39.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Tragic
79.3%

Chinese vs Shoshone Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 6.8%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseShoshone
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
43.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Tragic
35.3%

Chinese vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseShoshone
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
8.8%

Chinese vs Shoshone Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.8%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseShoshone
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Tragic
83.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
38.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Tragic
29.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
11.1%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Chinese vs Shoshone Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Chinese vs Shoshone Disability
Disability MetricChineseShoshone
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
49.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%