Chinese vs Immigrants from Kenya Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,560,119 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.874. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.585% in Immigrants from Kenya. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 585.0 Immigrants from Kenya.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,710, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,068, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $97,964, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,535, a difference of 4.9%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,214, a difference of 5.7%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 43.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 41.7%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.2%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%).