Chinese vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,573,595 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 102.2 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,535, a difference of 30.1%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,607, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $99,904, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $54,721, a difference of 3.9%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,461, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,940, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 68.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.8%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.0%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.6% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.9%).