Chinese vs Belizean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,502,165 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Belizeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,580, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $88,684, a difference of 31.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $77,028, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $37,429, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,094, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,702, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 79.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 73.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 41.5%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.39, a difference of 1.4%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 74.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 103.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.59%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%).