Menominee vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,969,409 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.092% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to a decrease of 92.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $122,178, a difference of 58.9%), median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $67,353, a difference of 58.2%), and median family income ($79,563 compared to $125,540, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,907 compared to $57,931, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $69,174, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (25.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 86.5%), receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 79.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (23.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 112.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 80.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 128.3%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 107.1%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 81.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 127.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 117.0%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 107.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.65%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 138.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 82.7%), and male disability (15.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (52.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.2%).