Chinese vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,897,766 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 37.9 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,624, a difference of 32.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $94,982, a difference of 22.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $81,489, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,894, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,641, a difference of 7.0%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $51,836, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 63.5%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 56.0%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.6%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 101.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 71.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.90%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.1%).